Moral letters to Lucilius/Appendix

Volume II.

APPENDIX

containing some new readings found in the Codex Quirinianus (Q), a MS. of the ninth or tenth century, published at Brescia by Achilles Beltrami in 1916. The MS. includes Epp. I–LXXXVIII.

I. 5. superest, sat est vulg.
de homine moderato sat est Q.
da hominem moderatum: sat est Beltrami.
VIII. 7. differetur Q.
differtur vulg.
XIV. 17. adde Q, confirming L¹; ede rell.
XXV. 2. perfecturus Q; profecturus vulg.
XXXIII. 9. quid est quod a(r) te Q; quid est quare et Hense; etc.
XLVIII. 1. quae tam longa quam Q; tam longam quam rell
LXV. 22. vindicet Q; ducet vulg.
LXVI. 32. virtuti: nihil enim aliud est virtus quam recta ratio. omnes virtutes rationes sunt Q, confirming Schweighaeuser.
LXXI. 7. Before nisi qui omnia bona exaequaverit, Q adds nisi qui omnia prior i(p)se contempserit.
LXXI. 12. de hoc cursu Q; ex h. c. vulg.
LXXII. 3. Q adds (after philosophandum est) sed ut philosopheris vacandum est.
LXXV. 1. desideremus Q; sederemus vulg.
LXXVI. 20. Q adds (after calcasse) inventus est qui divitias proiceret.
LXXVII. 17. Q adds (after doleas) amicos scis enim amicus esse.
LXXVIII. 9. longior impetus mora Q; impetus mora rell.
LXXXI. 8. esse grati Q; esse rell.
LXXXI. 21. Q adds (after urget) nemo sibi gratus est qui alteri non fuit. hoc me putas dicere qui ingratus est miser erit.
LXXXII. 11. sed ille Rutilius qui fortiore vultu in exilium iit quam misisset Q; ut quam misisset MSS.
LXXXIII. 2. Q adds (after cogitamus) et id raro; quid fecerimus non cogitamus.
LXXXIV. 11. Q adds nihil vitaverimus nisi ratione suadente, with a twelfth-century MS.
LXXXVII. 26. After sustuleris Q adds non ideo sustuleris.
LXXXVIII. 41. non vis cogitare Q, with some later MSS.; non cogitare rell.

Volume III.

APPENDIX A

Ep. xciv. deals, on the whole, with the question whether doctrines without precepts are enough for the student and the philosopher; Ep. xcv. whether precepts without doctrines will suffice. Seneca concludes that they are both necessary and are complementary to one another, especially in view of the complicated life which one is called upon to live, with its many duties and choices. The terms discussed, with some of the Greek original definitions, may be summed up as follows:—

(1) The outward expressions of ἐπιστήμη (scientia, knowledge) and of the κοιναὶ ἔννοιαι (notiones communes, προλήψεις, innate ideas) are found in the form of ἀξιώματα (pronuntiata, incontrovertible statements), δόγματα (placita, decreta, scita, doctrines, tenets, dogmas, principles). Determined by ὅροι (definitiones, definitions), they are tested by their ἀξία (honestum, moral value), by the κριτήριον (norma iudicii, standard of judgement) or κανών (lex, regula, etc.), and by the ὀρθὸς λόγος (recta ratio, universal law, etc.). By such means the doctrines of philosophy are contrasted with δόξα (opinio) and with a κατάληψις (cognitio or comprehensio) which falls short of completeness and perfection. Conduct which results from a thorough understanding and performance of such doctrines is κατόρθωμα (τέλειον καθῆκον, perfectum officium, “absolute duty”).

(2) The pars praeceptiva (παραινετική) of philosophy, which deals with “average duty” (καθῆκον, commune or medium officium), is approved, among others, by Posidonius, Cicero (see the De Officiis), and Seneca. It is related to active living and to the ἀδιάφορα (media or indifferentia) (see Subject Index) which play so large a rôle in the individual’s daily existence. This department of “counsel,” “admonition,” or “advice” has many forms. For παραίνεσις (monitio) are needed: the λόγος προτρεπτικός (exhortatio), τόπος ὑποθετικός (suasio), ἀποτροπή (dissuasio), ἐπιτίμησις (obiurgatio), λόγος παραμυθητικός (consolatio), αἰτιολογία (causarum inquisitio), ἠθολογία (descriptio), and all the gamut of precepts which run from blame to praise. These are reinforced by ἀπόδειξις (probatio, argumentum, proof) and by such helps as χρεῖαι, ἀπομνημονεύματα (sententiae, proverbs, maxims).

By such stages of advancement, προκοπή (progressio), and relying upon παραδείγματα (exempla), one rises, through practical precepts and the observance of duties, to an appreciation of the virtues, the contemplative mastery of the Universe, and to the Supreme Good, conformity with Nature (ὁμολογουμένως τῇ φύσει ζῆν, vivere convenienter naturae).

APPENDIX B

The following publications may profitably be consulted by one who wishes to investigate Seneca’s prose further:

E. Albertini. La Composition dans les ouvrages philosophiques de Sénèque. Paris, 1923 (with full bibliography of recent works).
A. Bourgery. Sénèque prosateur, études littéraires et grammaticales sur la prose de Sénèque le philosophe. Paris, 1922.

With special reference to Ep. xc. and other passages, one may consult:—

I. Heinemann. Poseidonios’ metaphysische Schriften. Breslau, 1921.
K. Reinhardt. Poseidonios. Munich, 1921.