Page:NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods - 2552.pdf/1

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
METHYL ACRYLATE
2552
C4H6O2
MW: 86.1
CAS: 96-33-3
RTECS: AT2800000

METHOD: 2552, Issue 1
EVALUATION: PARTIAL
Issue 1: 15 March 2003

OSHA 10 ppm PROPERTIES flammable liquid; den = 0.9574 g/mL @ 20°C; BP = 80.5°C; VP = 65 mm Hg @ 20°C; Flash Point = -3°C; FP = -76.7°C; Vapor Density = 2.95.
NIOSHI 10 ppm
ACGIH 2 ppm (skin notation)
(1 ppm = 3.52 mg/m3

SYNONYMS: Methoxycarbonylethylene, Methyl ester of acrylic acid, Methyl propenoate, 2-propenoic acid methyl ester.

SAMPLING MEASUREMENT
SAMPLER: SOLID SORBENT TUBE
(Anasorb CMS, 150/75 mg)
TECHNIQUE: GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY, FID
FLOW RATE: 0.01 to 0.2 L/min ANALYTE methyl acrylate
VOL-MIN:
 -MAX:
1 L @ 10 ppm
5 L
DESORPTION: 1 mL of carbon disulfide with agitation.
INJECTION VOLUME: 1 μL
SHIPMENT: Keep cold; pack securely for shipment. TEMPERATURE
 -INJECTION
 -DETECTOR
 -COLUMN

250°C
300°C
35°C (hold 3 min) to 150°C (8°C/min)
SAMPLE STABILITY: 30 days @ 5°C
BLANKS: 2 - 10 field blanks per set CARRIER GAS: He (2.6 mL/min)
ACCURACY COLUMN: Capillary, fused silica, 30-m x 0.53-mm ID; 3μm film crossbonded® 35% diphenyl-65% dimethyl polysiloxane or equivalent
RANGE STUDIED: Not studied.
BIAS Not determined CALIBRATION: Solutions of methyl acrylate in CS2
OVERALL PRECISION (S,T): Not determined. RANGE: 1.9 to 172.3 μg per sample [1]
ACCURACY: Not determined. ESTIMATED LOD: 0.5 ug per sample [1]
PRECISION (S,): 0.007 [1]

APPLICABILITY: The working range is 0.11 to 9.79 ppm (0.39 to 34.5 mg/m3 for a 5 L air sample [1]. Method is applicable to any sampling environment where methyl acrylate is present in the vapor state.


INTERFERENCES: Any compound eluting during the analysis and having a similar retention time.


OTHER METHODS: This method updates NMAM 1459 [2] which is Method S38 from the 2nd edition of the NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods [3]. Improvements include but are not limited to the following: smaller volume of desorption solvent required, desorption efficiency (DE) results were improved by using a different solid sorbent tube, and a lower LOD/LOQ was established [1]. A storage stability study was completed and was found acceptable with a 105.3% recovery after 4 weeks at 5°C [1].




NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM), Fourth Edition