Reconstruction:Proto-Yeniseian/kʷetʳ
Proto-Yeniseian
Alternative reconstructions
- *əˀλ, *(k)əλə, *(dʲ)əλə, *xəˀr- (“frog”) (per Werner 2002)
- *xǝʔr-, *jVʔra (per Starostin 1994-2005)
- *ʌˀl, *ʌˀλ, *(k)ʌˀλ, *(H)ʌλʌ (per Vajda-Werner 2022)
- *u̯ʌr₁, *wʌr₁, *gwʌr₁ (per Cologne group 2023 & 2024. Pattern: ?[1]-l.2)
Reconstruction notes
Yugh *ʌˀr is expected. Usually, Proto-Yeniseian *-tʳ in coda position yields Proto-Ketic *-r/λ, which results in Ket -lʲ and Yugh -r. This particular change occurs only once, which is suggestive of a borrowing from Ket instead.
Etymology
Khabtagaeava (2019)[2] assumes Kott d'ira (dʲira, “lizard”) and its variants to be borrowings from Proto-Turkic *yï̄lan (“snake”). Vajda (2024) on the other hand argues against this in light of the regular sound correspondences between Proto-Yeniseian and Kottic.
Arin descendant is also problematic. Cologne group (2024) argues that the Arin kerep and kerép (“boat”)[3] are indicative of a misglossing for the Arin "reflex", as also pointed out by E. A. Helimski (1986:193). This would mean taj (“boat, or frog”) is the intended gloss, and kere is irrelevant. Despite this, Vajda (2024) still includes Arin as a descendant, as does Werner (2002) and Vajda-Werner (2022) and more recently, Bonnman-Fries (2025) in their dissertation on Xiōngnú Confederacy having possibly spoken an Arin-type language based on the available data.
Noun
*kʷetʳ (plural *kʷetʳ-ja-n)
Descendants
- Ketic:
- Ket: ъ’ль (ʌˀlʲ, “frog”)
- → Yug: ъ’л (ʌˀl, “frog”)
- Ket: ъ’ль (ʌˀlʲ, “frog”)
- Kottic:
- Kott: d'ira (dʲira), d'era (dʲera), d'ipi (dʲipi), díbaŋ (“lizard”)
- Arinic:
- >? Arin: kere (“frog”)
- → Proto-Common Turkic: *kele-ŕ ~ *kele-r (“lizard”)[4]
References
- ^ Fries, Simon; Bonmann, Svenja (2023), “The development of Arin kul 'water', Kott ûl, Ket ¹uˑl' Yugh ¹ur and its typological background”, in International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics, volume 5, number 2, pages 183-198
- ^ Khabtagaeva, Bayarma (2019), Language Contact in Siberia: Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic Loanwords in Yeniseian (The languages of Asia series; 19)[1], Brill, →ISBN, page 51
- ^ Werner, Heinrich (2005), “kere [?] (H), kerep (M, W), kerép (VW, W, Kl)”, in Die Jenissej-Sprachen des 18. Jahrhunderts, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, →ISBN, page 159
- ^ Bonmann, Svenja; Fries, Simon (2025), “Linguistic Evidence Suggests That Xiōng-nú and Huns Spoke the Same Paleo-Siberian Language”, in Transactions of the Philological Society[2], volume 0, , page 7, 9 of 1-24
Further reading
- Hill, Eugen; Fries, Simon; Korobzow, Natalie; Günther, Laura; Svenja, Bonmann (2024), “Towards a New Reconstruction of the Proto-Yeniseian Sound System. Part II: Word-Final Consonants”, in International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics[3], number 6, Brill, , →ISSN, page 263 of 216-293
- Vajda, Edward; Werner, Heinrich (2022), “*(H)ʌλʌ > *(k)ʌˀλ/*ʌˀλ”, in Comparative-Historical Yeniseian Dictionary (Languages of the World/Dictionaries; 79, 80), Muenchen: LINCOM GmbH, →ISBN, page 323
- Vajda, Edward; Werner, Heinrich (2022), “*ʌˀl (1)”, in Comparative-Historical Yeniseian Dictionary (Languages of the World/Dictionaries; 79, 80), Muenchen: LINCOM GmbH, →ISBN, page 1043
- Vajda, Edward (2024), “*kʷetʳ-ja, *kʷetʳ-ja-n”, in The Languages and Linguistics of Northern Asia: Language Families (The World of Linguistics [WOL]; 10.1)[4], volume 1, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, , →ISBN, page 421
- Werner, Heinrich (2002), “²ʌˀl'”, in Vergleichendes Wörterbuch der Jenissej-Sprachen, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, →ISBN, page 415
- Werner, Heinrich (2005), “frog”, in Die Jenissej-Sprachen des 18. Jahrhunderts, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, →ISBN, page 298