indén

Old Irish

Alternative forms

Etymology

From Proto-Celtic *andegʷnā, from *ande- (whence also Old Irish ind-) + Proto-Indo-European *gʷʰen- (to strike). Brittonic cognates include Old Welsh ennian (Welsh einion), Old Cornish ennian (Cornish anwan), and Middle Breton anneffn (Breton annev).

Stokes and Pedersen's treatment of this word as an i-stem noun is incorrect, given the existence of nominative singular indén and genitive plural indéon.

Some form of this etymology can be traced back to Stokes, who reconstructs Proto-Celtic *andebnis, from *ande- + the root of benaid (to strike).[1] However, modern scholarship holds that benaid comes from Proto-Indo-European *bʰeyh₂- (to strike, hit) and that the n is part of the present suffix, not part of the root. On the other hand, Stokes’ etymology of benaid lists Sanskrit हन्ति (hanti, to strike, smite) and Ancient Greek θείνω (theínō, to strike, wound) as cognates, meaning he associated it with Proto-Indo-European *gʷʰen- (to strike, kill) (the source of gonaid (to wound)).[2]

The stem *andegʷn- is expected to give indén when unpalatalized (such as in the nominative singular), which is attested in the Eriugena glosses. The stem allomorph *indíuin- with raising and palatalization is the expected outcome in the dative and genitive singular, and appears as expected in Sanas Cormaic and a gloss to the Cáin Ónae. The form *indéoin with palatalization but not raising, which also appears in Middle Irish inneóin and Modern Irish inneoin, was originally solely the accusative singular.

The form indéin (which occurs only once in the St. Gall glosses) is due to a total generalization of the é from the nominative (singular and plural) and dative plural across the entire paradigm, followed by the secondary use of the dative singular for the nominative singular as typical for an ā-stem.

Alternatively, Pedersen reconstructs Proto-Indo-European *n̥dʰi-ponis[3] (giving Proto-Celtic *andeɸonis in our notation), which would be cognate with Lithuanian pi̇̀nti (to plait), Old Church Slavonic пѧти (pęti, to tie, fix), Ancient Greek πένομαι (pénomai, to toil, labor), from Proto-Indo-European *(s)penh₁- (to twist, weave). However, this connection is semantically less plausible than the connection with verbs meaning strike, hit, and the appearance of the form indén in the Eriugena glosses makes this etymology phonetically impossible.

Pronunciation

  • IPA(key): /ˈin̠ʲ.d̠ʲeːn/

Noun

indén f

  1. anvil
    • c. 845, St Gall Glosses on Priscian, published in Thesaurus Palaeohibernicus (reprinted 1975, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies), edited and with translations by Whitley Stokes and John Strachan, vol. II, pp. 49–224, Sg. 110b1
      indéin [translating incus]anvil
  2. griddle, gridiron

Inflection

ā-stem inflection is confirmed by the genitive plural indéon found in Hail Brigit.

This is the original declension:

Feminine ā-stem
singular dual plural
nominative indénL indéoinL indénaH
vocative indénL indéoinL indénaH
accusative indéoinN indéoinL indénaH
genitive indíuineH indénL indénN
dative indíuinL indénaib indénaib
Initial mutations of a following adjective:
  • H = triggers aspiration
  • L = triggers lenition
  • N = triggers nasalization

The vocalism of the second syllable was highly vulnerable to intra-paradigmatic leveling. The St. Gall glosses show generalization of é while Hail Brigit shows the generalization of éo.

Descendants

  • Middle Irish: indeóin, inneóin

Mutation

Mutation of indén
radical lenition nasalization
indén
(pronounced with /h/ in h-prothesis environments)
indén n-indén

Note: Certain mutated forms of some words can never occur in Old Irish.
All possible mutated forms are displayed for convenience.

References

  1. ^ Stokes, Whitley; Bezzenberger, Adalbert (1894), Urkeltischer Sprachschatz (Wörterbuch der indogermanischen Sprachen; Zweiter Theil) (in German), Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, page 15
  2. ^ Stokes, Whitley; Bezzenberger, Adalbert (1894), Urkeltischer Sprachschatz (Wörterbuch der indogermanischen Sprachen; Zweiter Theil) (in German), Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, page 167
  3. ^ Pedersen, Holger (1909), Vergleichende Grammatik der keltischen Sprachen [Comparative Grammar of the Celtic Languages] (in German), volume I, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, →ISBN, § 69, page 114

Further reading